<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://sokobano.de/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ASolver_Statistics</id>
	<title>Talk:Solver Statistics - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://sokobano.de/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ASolver_Statistics"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://sokobano.de/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Solver_Statistics&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-17T17:48:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://sokobano.de/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Solver_Statistics&amp;diff=3757&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Matthias Meger: Thank you for the new statistics, Minglw!</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://sokobano.de/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Solver_Statistics&amp;diff=3757&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-02-26T19:12:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the new statistics, Minglw!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In the links where they take you to the level set&amp;#039;s summary page,&lt;br /&gt;
what do you think the proper format should be?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now, it&amp;#039;s mostly:    &lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - &amp;lt;level set author&amp;gt; | &amp;lt;level set name&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    when we know who the author is.&lt;br /&gt;
    Otherwise, I left the &amp;lt;level set author&amp;gt; to be the level set name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think the link format should be changd to this?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - &amp;lt;level set name&amp;gt; | &amp;lt;level set name&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F0FFF0;padding:5px;border:1px solid green;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I think the name of the author should be there anywhere. Maybe it&amp;#039;s a good idea to add the name in the table: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Collection name, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Author&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Levels, BoxSearch, Takaken, YASS ?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solido has used the &amp;quot;tip&amp;quot; template to display the results compacter.&lt;br /&gt;
Here it is:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;soko-table&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;50&amp;quot;| XSokoban Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
|- bgcolor=&amp;quot;#f1efe5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;amp;#160; || width=&amp;quot;150&amp;quot;|BoxSearch || width=&amp;quot;150&amp;quot;|Takaken || width=&amp;quot;150&amp;quot;|YASS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| bgcolor=&amp;quot;#f1efe5&amp;quot;|failed on these levels where at least one solver solved || count: &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;36&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; {{tip| 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37, 39 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 57 , 61 , 71 , 72 , 73, 74 , 76 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 90 |menu=yes|width=150px|text=maps:}} || count: &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; || count: &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;51&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; {{tip| 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 68 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 76 , 79 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 90 |menu=yes|width=150px|text=maps:}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| bgcolor=&amp;quot;#f1efe5&amp;quot;|solved these levels where all other solvers failed || || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| bgcolor=&amp;quot;#f1efe5&amp;quot;|failed on these levels where all other solvers solved || || ||&lt;br /&gt;
|- bgcolor=&amp;quot;#f1efe5&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! total solved || 42 || 78 || 27&lt;br /&gt;
|- bgcolor=&amp;quot;#f1efe5&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| total failed || 48 || 12 || 63&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it&amp;#039;s a good idea, isn&amp;#039;t it ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthias&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it&amp;#039;s a good idea that we add a column for &amp;quot;author&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
I added this column to the table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discussion topic:&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think we should name all of the summary pages (and links) without the level set&amp;#039;s name ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it&amp;#039;s better not to use the author&amp;#039;s name.&lt;br /&gt;
For example, for the Sven collection, we have:&lt;br /&gt;
  Solver Statistics - Sven Egevad&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is ok if we have only one set from this author.&lt;br /&gt;
For authors (i.e. David W Skinner) with multiple level sets, this won&amp;#039;t work.&lt;br /&gt;
As a work around now, I appended a number after the author&amp;#039;s name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we should really change this to use the level set name instead of&lt;br /&gt;
the author&amp;#039;s name.  Furthermore, we are really referring to the results of&lt;br /&gt;
using a particular level set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I think a link should be like this:  (again using Sven as an example)&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - Sven level set&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And for David W Skinner, we have these:&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - Microban level set&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - Mas Microban level set&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - Sasquatch level set&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
instead of:&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - David W Skinner&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - David W Skinner 2&lt;br /&gt;
    Solver Statistics - David W Skinner 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This will make it easier to create the link with a logical/reasonable format and won&amp;#039;t have any collision.&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you like this idea or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#F0FFF0;padding:5px;border:1px solid green;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You are right. It doesn&amp;#039;t make sense to use names like &amp;quot;David W Skinner 3&amp;quot; ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We should use the set name instead. The new author column shows the author name - that&amp;#039;s enough. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthias&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Matthias Meger</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>